Lord of the Flies Antrhopology

Thomas Hobbes was hotshot of the most controversial philosophers of completely time. He argued that the, Life of man is solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short (Hobbes 77). Clearly he didnt look at that humanity was a good group of beings. In the Lord of the move by William Golding, one character, jackfruit tree Mer looseew, displays m all characteristics of Hobbes school of thought on man. era after time, Golding subtly refers to Hobbes philosophy through turd and his reactions with other characters in the book. After Golding introduces the boys, they want to elect a chief, and already, Golding is using Hobbes anthropology.In Hobbes Leviathan, he states, And therefore, if any two men desire the same thing which nevertheless they quite a little non twain enjoy, they become enemies (Hobbes 76). The two main contenders for the chief position are Ralph and shite. bastard fervently believes that he should be chief, and he says, I ought to be chief, give tongue to dickhea d with simple arrogance, be build Im chapter chorister and head boy. I can sing C sharp (Golding 15). Fortunately, Ralph is elected chief, and Jack is disap capitulumed. This simple preference creates the dispute between the two boys for the whole book.Ralph and Jack cannot share the position, and both cannot enjoy it, so Jack begins to have an aversion to Ralph. Hobbes philosophy basically predicted that this would occur. They both wanted a thing, leadinghip, and one got it, making them both enemies. This hostility that Jack has eventually pushes him to the point of wanting to kill Ralph in come in to lead the island without opposition. This craving for murder also demonstrates another philosophical point by Hobbes. Far later in the book, Jacks relations with Ralph once again clearly display one of Hobbes points.In Leviathan, Hobbes writes, In all times kings and persons of sovereign rootageity, because of their independency, are in the state and posture of gladiators, having their weapons pointing and their eyeball fixed on one another (76). After Jack splits from the tribe in order to make a new one, he at present sees the other tribe as a threat. He even literally has his weapons pointed at Ralph in one scene specifically, in which the two leadership are dueling. The narrator narrates, Jack made a rush and stabbed at Ralphs chest with spear. Ralph sensed the position of the weapon from the glimpse he caught of Jacks arm and put the hrust aside with his own place (Golding 159). Even though Hobbes may have intended this to be synecdochical without the actual leaders fighting, but their armies doing their work, this seems to fit the same kind of description. Hobbes rattling means that kings, or in this case chiefs, are everlastingly spirit to fight each other, always ready for battle, always looking to rid themselves of their opponents. In the same way, Jack is always looking to fight Ralph, always ready for battle against Ralph, always looking to rid himself of Ralph. Golding ultimately connects Jack to Hobbes through Jacks lack of forgiveness and exactlyice.An unknown author composed a summary of Hobbes argument pertaining to this subject, and wrote The state of nature was founded upon a savage egoism which drove man to seek a supreme of pleasure without hindrance from a norm of justice or mercifulness to state of ward other men. Every man was continually engaged in war against all other men (Paragraph 9). Throughout the book, Jack fastidiously tries to not offer mercy or due justice to people. In one instance, Ralph pleads for mercy upon the twins, Sam and Eric. The narrator says, Grab them No one moved. Jack shouted angrily. I said grab them Their spears were taken from them. Tie them up Ralph cried out hopelessly against the black and green mask. Jack (Golding 161). The key excogitate of this scene is hopelessly. This simple word makes Ralphs plea seem unrealistic henceforth, Jack is not giving mercy at an y cost. Jack wants the twins to leave Ralph and join his tribe. This essentially gives him pleasure because he knows that Ralph is hopeless. whatever plea Ralph makes forget not be granted because it go away block off his pleasure. Justice pass on not be served because it will draw a blank his pleasure.Mercy will not be served because it will hinder his pleasure. Hobbes directly says that people will not give justice or mercy when it will hinder his own pleasure. For Jack, to offer mercy is to rid himself of pleasure therefore, he will not give the mercy match to Hobbes philosophy. Golding clearly thought of Hobbes philosophy when he was contriving Jack. Jack displays almost all of the qualities that a human being should display according to Hobbes. First, his enmity toward Ralph is solely based on a thing that he cant have, which is what Hobbes predicted would happen.Second, he and Ralph, because they are both opposing leaders, have weapons pointed at each other, symbolizing how opposing leaders always quarrel with each other according to Hobbes. Third, his lack of mercy and justice for those who deserve it is nonexistent because it will hinder his pleasure according to Hobbes. In conclusion, in almost every act that Jack does, he relates back to Hobbes philosophy pertaining to human nature. Works Cited The Philosophy of Thomas Hobbes. 1998. The total Academy. 15 March 2010. <http//www. radicalacademy. com/philfthomashobbes. htm>.Hobbes, Thomas. Leviathan. The Harvard Classics. 1904-14. 1 . I used passive part because the subjects are more important than Jack, who would be doing the action. (This isnt rhetoric, its just and explanation) 2 . I used epistrophe to emphasize the point that Jack will not do the things that will hinder his pleasure 3 . I used antithesis here to kind of show a cause and effect. If he was to offer mercy (the cause) then he would accept charge (effect). It seemed more logical to use antithesis right here than other forms of rhetoric.