Critique of Thank You for Smoking? Essay -- Critiques

Critique of Thank You for Smoking? Thank You for Smoking? is an article create verbally by stopcock Brimelow about the benefits of smoking. Brimelow provides or so very clear points which ar well addressed. Even though I do not defy with the subject that smoking, in a way, is good for you, (141) I think Peter Brimelow did a thorough muse of making his opinions credible to the endorser. Major make and GroundsThis essay is a good example of a deductive essay because it moves from generalizations to specific instances (McFadden, 2003). It does this by stating the major claim that smoking, in some small ways, can be good for stack. The major claim is a statement of detail, judgment, or policy (McFadden, 2003). It is what the author is trying to make the reader think. In the article, Thank You for Smoking, Brimelow attempts to prove that smoking whitethorn help the soulify counteract the effects of numerous diseases, including Parkinsons and Alzheimers. This list of ex amples of diseases is known as the grounds. The grounds in a paper consist of evidence, facts, and logic employ to support the claim (McFadden, 2003). The major claim is well supported by the grounds and makes Brimelows arguments sound believable. Brimelows evidence shows smoking may be beneficial through the use of percentages. These percentages show the amount of people who are helped with common diseases by smoking. The use of these grounds gives Brimelows arguments credibleness through factual information.Rebuttal and QualifierBrimelow does a complete job of keeping the reader interested by refuting his own statements. He quotes the surgeon Generals warning that smoking is dangerous to a persons health (p. 141). The preceding sentence is ... ...phs (143). By attacking a person or group, Brimelow is swaying from the issue and drawing the reader away from what they should be thinking about which is smoking, not lawyers. In this article, attack was not successful. This is the totally part of the article where Brimelow lost credibility because he swayed from his issue. ConclusionThe closedown to Brimelows article is smoking does have benefits. His article has not swayed me to go buy a pack of Camels, but it has opened my eyes to the fact that there could be some benefits to smoking. Overall, Brimelows claims and evidence were strong and I gained more insight on the topic of smoking. ReferencesMcFadden, J. (2003). Title of PPT. Buena Vista University. ram Lake, IA.Wallace, V. (1998). Give Children the Vote. The Genre of Argument. Ed. Irene L. Clark. Boston Thomson/Heinle. Pages.